In my last column, I talked about the basics of a HazCom, or hazard communications, discussion: toxicology, toxicity and dosage. As a reminder, HazCom is the communication of chemical hazards to the workforce — and lack of it can quickly lead to an OSHA citation. This time, I want to start with a little bit more about the “time” part of the dose equation:
Concentration x Time = Dose
Time matters just as much as concentration. We talked last time about measuring toxicity, the “concentration” part of the equation. But what language should we use when talking about exposure times?
Acute vs. Chronic Expossure
Talk about the time aspect of the dose equation often revolves around two words: acute and chronic. We call one-time, high-level exposure “acute.” Have you ever gotten a headache from bleach fumes in an enclosed space? That’s acute exposure. Symptoms of these types of exposures often show up immediately but can appear several hours later.
We call low-level exposure over a long period “chronic.” Symptoms related to chronic exposure may not show up for 10 to 20 years. Examples of chronic exposures leading to workplace illnesses include mesothelioma, silicosis and black lung disease.
Chemical Exposure on the Job
Toxic substances typically enter our body through one of four routes:
Once a substance enters our body, it does one of three things with the chemical. We metabolize it, excrete it or store it. While our body works on that, the chemical often works on a target organ or organs — that is, the parts of the body most affected. Remember, harm may not always be at the point of contact. If a chemical or substance has a “systemic” effect, adverse health impacts may take place far away from the body's initial point of contact (like in one of those target organs). For example, benzene affects bone marrow and lead affects the central nervous system.
Remember, too, that often an exposure may involve multiple chemicals. Some substances have a synergistic effect when introduced together, meaning the total effect can be greater than the effect of each chemical by itself.
Protecting Workers from Toxic Exposures
Industrial hygienists at government agencies have come up with exposure limits, that is, the maximum amount of exposure a worker could experience in an 8-hour shift with no adverse health effects. OSHA calls theirs the permissible exposure limit (PEL). In the U.S., it is unlawful to expose workers to concentrations higher than the PEL. When workplace concentrations exceed the PEL, an employer must take measures to reduce the potential exposure for workers. However, the PEL is not the most protective exposure limit standard. (OSHA even says it hasn’t updated many PELs since 1970.) The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) also has recommended exposure limits (RELs). In many cases, NOISH limits are stricter than OSHA.
Usually, we express exposure limits in parts per million (ppm) or milligrams per cubic meter (Mg/m3). How small is one part per million? It’s about:
Before we wrap up, let me share other important exposure-related terms to know:
In my next column, I’ll help you take some of this knowledge and use it to develop a HazCom program for the chemical hazards your employees may face.
Until next time, stay safe and keep turning the right.