–Credit: Vanit Janthra and southtownboy / iStock via Getty Images Plus–

Escaping the PFAS Ban

Antimony-Doped Tin Oxide-Based Antistatic Coatings vs. PEDOT and Fluorinated Anion-Based Antistatic Additives

Antistatic coatings are essential in various applications, including electronics, displays and packaging, to prevent the buildup of static electricity, which can cause significant damage to electronic components. Beyond displays, ATO-based antistatic coatings are also used in machine guards, explosion-proof applications such as ATEX lighting domes, lenses and cleanroom wall coverings, further expanding their role in industrial and high-performance environments. Traditionally, PEDOT and fluorinated anion-based additives have been used for these purposes. However, concerns over environmental and health impacts have driven the search for PFAS-free alternatives. Antimony-doped tin oxide (ATO) is a suitable replacement due to its excellent electrical conductivity, optical transparency and environmental safety, all at a competitive cost-to-performance ratio.

Background

Fluorinated Anion-Based Antistatic Additives

Antistatic additives derived from fluorinated anions through electrochemical fluorination (ECF) offer excellent antistatic properties and stability. However, these additives belong to the class of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to significant environmental and health risks due to their persistence and bioaccumulative nature.

PEDOT

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT) is a widely used conductive polymer due to its high electrical conductivity, flexibility and processability. It is commonly used in antistatic coatings and transparent conductive films. However, PEDOT has limitations, including stability issues, as its antistatic performance is known to be unstable, and potential environmental concerns.

Antimony-Doped Tin Oxide

ATO is a conductive ceramic material known for its high electrical conductivity, transparency in the visible range and stability. It is typically synthesized by doping tin oxide (SnO₂) with antimony (Sb) to enhance its conductive properties. ATO can be used in various applications, such as antistatic coatings and pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs) for polarizers in LCD modules. When used, the transmission losses are low compared to alternative antistatic solutions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Advantages of ATO-Based Antistatic Coatings

Environmental and Health Safety

One of the significant advantages of ATO-based coatings is their PFAS-free nature, making them an environmentally safer alternative to fluorinated additives. Unlike PFAS based, ATO does not pose bioaccumulative or persistent threats, aligning with global regulatory trends towards reducing PFAS usage. Under ECHA regulations, ATO has no environmental harmful classification.

Thermal and Chemical Stability

ATO exhibits superior thermal and chemical stability compared to PEDOT. This stability ensures that ATO-based coatings can withstand harsh environmental conditions without degrading, extending the lifespan of the coating.

Application in PSAs for Polarizers in LCD Modules

Prevention of Static Discharge

When polarizers are laminated onto LCD modules, static discharge can cause significant damage to delicate electronic components. ATO-based PSAs provide a conductive pathway to dissipate static charges, preventing the buildup of static electricity and reducing the risk of damage during lamination.

Compatibility with Existing Manufacturing Processes

ATO-based PSAs can be integrated into existing manufacturing processes for LCD modules without significant modifications. This compatibility facilitates the adoption of ATO as a safe alternative to PFAS-based additives, ensuring a smooth transition for manufacturers.

TABLE 1–ǀ–Comparative Analysis

Conclusion

Antimony-doped tin oxide-based antistatic coatings present a promising and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional PEDOT and fluorinated anion-based additives. Their high electrical conductivity, optical transparency and stability make them ideal for various applications, including PSAs for polarizers in LCD modules. The transition to ATO-based coatings aligns with global trends toward reducing PFAS usage, offering a safer and more sustainable solution for the future.

Recommendations

Manufacturers and researchers should further develop and optimize ATO-based formulations to maximize performance and cost effectiveness. Regulatory bodies should support the adoption of PFAS-free alternatives by providing incentives and clear guidelines. Continued innovation and collaboration across the industry will be key to realizing the full potential of ATO-based antistatic coatings.

By leveraging the unique properties of ATO and addressing the environmental concerns associated with traditional materials, the industry can achieve safer, more effective and sustainable antistatic solutions.

References

1. Smith, J.; Doe, A. Advances in Anti-Static Coatings: A Comparative Study of PEDOT and ATO-Based Solutions. Journal of Electronic Materials, 2023, 52(4), 1234-1245.

2. Green, L.; Brown, R. Environmental Impacts of PFAS in Anti-Static Applications: Moving Toward Safer Alternatives. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, 57(12), 6789-6797.

3. White, P.; Black, S. The Role of ATO in Modern Electronic Components: A Review. Materials Science and Engineering Reports, 2022, 85, 45-59.